Learn English – Using source as a verb to mean “to provide a citation”

ambiguitymeaning

Recently on the meta for English.se, I used the following sentence:

Personally, I think we should source answers if possible, but this is also sensitive to the level of the asker.

My question relates to whether this usage of source as a verb is as one person responded "a rather lazy and hence unclear phrase?"

The other person suggested that it could admit two interpretations:

we should provide sources in answers

OR

we should seek answers


google defines source as a verb as follows:

obtain from a particular source.

I learned to use source in the way I describe in the midst of university teaching. Specifically, we often say regarding claims that are not original to a student or that state data without a citation — "you need to source this."

Is something in my usage odd, incorrect, or lazy?

Best Answer

I see nothing inherently wrong with employing source as a verb in either your sense or the commercial sense which Google afforded you.

It earned this sense by exactly the same process which gave rise to the established academic term to document, a similarly verbed noun which similarly is open to two constructions: to provide references to existing corroborative sources or to create a record which will constitute future corroborative sources.

Your only concern should be what audience you are addressing—some will consider your use of source breezily fresh, others cheesily faddish—and whether you care how they take it.

For the time being, source is slang and document is jargon. You pays your money and you takes your choice.