what is the meaning of the logical fallacy "shifting issues"? I have tried a web search on many different forms of the question "what is the definition of the logical fallacy shifting issues. I have tried purdue owl and texts such as The Little Brown Handbook. I cannot find either a definition or synonym for "shifting issues".
Learn English – what does the logical fallacy “shifting issues” mean
meaning
Related Solutions
For the time being, I would stick with "paperwork."
Notice that in a modern automobile, you still "roll up the windows." You still "dial a phone." Often, we retain words and phrases that would seem to be obsolete, because language generally changes more slowly than technology does.
However, in this specific case, 'paper' seems unnecessary - you could just say "I have a lot of work," or "please don't send me more work." The 'paper' bit is kind of superfluous.
The expression "too profound to be understood" appears in two contexts. The first expresses the idea of difficulty beyond the capacity of a certain audience. For example, from The Casket, Or, Flowers of Literature, Wit & Sentiment describing the life of Isaac Newton.
In 1687, his mathematical principles were published, which, being too profound to be understood by every one , met with no small opposition; but when they were once know, were so well received , that nothing was heard from all quarters but one general shout of admiration.
This is a reference to Newton's Principia* in which he developed his theory of gravitation using his discovery of the differential calculus, mathematics too difficult and new to be understood easily.
In The Electrician: A Weekly Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electricity and Chemical Physics, Volume 2 (1862):
The causation in both cases has been too profound to be understood; and that being unknown the functions themselves, and therefore the conditions on which they depend, have been more or less confounded together.
The two cases here are electrical charge and electrical conduction. These are mysteries that cannot be understood because the science hasn't caught up with the application. In this case, James Clerk Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism is over a decade away.
In the second usage, the phrase means that the understanding is not amenable to rational investigation at all. It isn't a matter of not being clever enough (like Newton's contemporaries) or that people are waiting for reasons be discovered (like electricians before Maxwell). The profundity here is of a different order. Henry Miller says in Sexus
Joy is founded on something too profound to be understood and communicated. To be joyous is to be a madman in a world of sad ghosts.
The experience of joy is insanity, the very essence of abandoning rational explanation altogether. This use shows up in descriptions of transcendental religious dogma. From Truth and Error: Comparative Charts of Cults and Christianity by A. W. Gomes:
The Greek word musterion may denote something too profound to be understood by human reason, or something once hidden but then revealed by God....
That is, the "knowing" via revelation surpasses the ability to know via ratiocination.
*PhilosophiƦ Naturalis Principia Mathematica or "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy"
Best Answer
It sounds like a restatement of Avoiding the Issue