I was going to use it in a book but wanted to know what everyone's thoughts.
What does "too profound to be understood" mean to you?
What does the phrase insinuate and are the other implications? I have found it is within 169 google books of which 94 are in the 21st century. Many of the places it is found are within Chinese-English translations of books.
Here are some examples:
"He was just trying to say that the deepest truths are always profound. They have no hierarchy. They are always one, good, and beautiful in ways in which these features cannot be disentangled. Of course, this is too profound to be understood"
"It may be that the saints, and even the elders, find such verses hard to comprehend, but that is because your eyes are clouded and you already have the concept that these matters are too profound to be understood."
Best Answer
The expression "too profound to be understood" appears in two contexts. The first expresses the idea of difficulty beyond the capacity of a certain audience. For example, from The Casket, Or, Flowers of Literature, Wit & Sentiment describing the life of Isaac Newton.
This is a reference to Newton's Principia* in which he developed his theory of gravitation using his discovery of the differential calculus, mathematics too difficult and new to be understood easily.
In The Electrician: A Weekly Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electricity and Chemical Physics, Volume 2 (1862):
The two cases here are electrical charge and electrical conduction. These are mysteries that cannot be understood because the science hasn't caught up with the application. In this case, James Clerk Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism is over a decade away.
In the second usage, the phrase means that the understanding is not amenable to rational investigation at all. It isn't a matter of not being clever enough (like Newton's contemporaries) or that people are waiting for reasons be discovered (like electricians before Maxwell). The profundity here is of a different order. Henry Miller says in Sexus
The experience of joy is insanity, the very essence of abandoning rational explanation altogether. This use shows up in descriptions of transcendental religious dogma. From Truth and Error: Comparative Charts of Cults and Christianity by A. W. Gomes:
That is, the "knowing" via revelation surpasses the ability to know via ratiocination.
*Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica or "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy"