Please consider these two different sentences*:
- I am aware of the using of this machine.
- I am accused of using my neighbour’s wifi.
Why do we use the article the before the using in the first sentence, but we don’t use an article before in the second sentence?
It’s the same gerund in both cases: the word using. So how can in some cases a gerund takes an article, but in other cases that same gerund does not take an article?
Best Answer
Gerunds are only ever verbs, never nouns
I think your mistake is pretending that any word that ends in -ing and which is derived from a verb is a “gerund”. This is not true. To be a gerund, it must be verb. And the first one is not:using is not gerund in first sentence. It’s only a noun—a deverbal noun, if you prefer. Nouns do noun things like taking articles, adjectives, and prepositional phrases.
For example, here taming is a noun only, not a verb, and therefore not a gerund:
You can tell it’s a noun not a verb because it’s doing noun things only, and it’s not doing verb things.
In contrast, here taming is indeed a verb with none of the customary nominal appurtenances:
This time taming takes an adverb not an adjective, has a direct-object argument, and accepts no article. That makes it a verb, not a noun. It is therefore a gerund. The other one is not.
But entire gerund phrases can replace entire noun phrases
A gerund phrase is a kind of non-finite verb phrase that is able to do the job of a noun phrase, including serving as the a clause’s subject and as a verb’s object complement or a prepositional object.
Those are gerunds, so only verbs not nouns. And those gerund phrases are not nouns, either, because you cannot do a noun thing to a gerund phrase even though a gerund phrase can itself do a noun-phrase thing. You have to look at these as replaceable constituents.
The other construction has no verb in it at all. It’s just a regular old noun phrase, not a gerund phrase.