Learn English – Why does child sometimes become a two-syllable word

For the same reason "surprise" is frequently pronounced as "sah-prise": people sometimes take shortcuts if the meaning is still clear even with the mispronunciation. For more examples, see here, including this detailed explanation of the specific pronunciations of "interesting":

Interesting IN-tris-ting or IN-tur-uh-sting or IN-tur-ES-ting.

All three pronunciations are acceptable, though not so long ago only the second was considered cultivated while the first was considered British and the third was frowned upon by some authorities. One reason there are so many accepted pronunciations is that most educated speakers do not say interesting in exactly the same way every time. Slight, unconscious variation is natural in rapid and informal speech, and when a certain variation recurs often enough in educated speech, it usually becomes the norm.

The three-syllable IN-tris-ting is a victim of syncope (SING-kuh-pee), the loss or omission of a sound or syllable from the middle of a word as in FAM-lee for family and KUHMF-tur-buul for comfortable (which see). It is now probably the most commonly heard pronunciation in American speech. The noun and verb interest is also a victim of syncope and is usually pronounced in two syllables, IN-trist, although the older IN-tur-ist is still heard. The verbal adjective interested is often pronounced in four syllables, IN-tur-ES-tid, but the evidence of my ears says the three-syllable IN-tris-tid is more common.

The four-syllable variant IN-tur-uh-sting, once the preferred pronunciation, is now much less common than the syncopated IN-tris-ting. The somewhat overpronounced IN-tur-ES-ting never had great currency. Speakers who normally say IN-tris-ting will sometimes use it for emphasis or ironically, drawing out the syllables, as in the stock phrase very interesting.

Apparently the original stress was on the second syllable, but poets bent its stress to whatever suited them. For example, both Chaucer and Shakespeare were known to use both versions (conˈtrary and ˈcontrary), although Shakespeare seems to have more often used the one with initial stress.

You can get all that from the OED’s elaborative note regarding the stress of contrary:

The later OFr. form contraire gave the variant contrair, long retained in the north. The original stress, after Fr. and L., wasconˈtra.rie, but the poets, from Chaucer to Spenser and Shakspere, use both conˈtra.ry and ˈco.ntrary (the latter the more frequent in Shaks.); of conˈtrā.ry, many instances occur in 17th c. verse; it is the only pronunciation recognized by Bailey (died 1742), and it is still app. universal in dialect and uneducated speech, esp. in sense ^{(def#3) (def#b)}, which is now confined to these forms of speech and to the nursery. ˈCo.ntrary was used by Milton and Pope, and is given by Johnson (though he retained conˈtra.rily, conˈtra.riness, conˈtra.riwise) and in all later dictionaries.