When one is unable to feel anger, and incapable of feeling any strong emotions, I would say that person is numb.
You can be numb with grief; unable to shed tears and to express your sorrow.
You can be so stunned and be in shock that your whole mind and body is paralysed or frozen into a state of inactivity; this goes for emotions too.
In wikipedia I found this article:
Emotional detachment
Emotional detachment, in psychology, can mean two different things. In the first meaning, it refers to an "inability to connect" with others emotionally, as well as a means of dealing with anxiety by preventing certain situations that trigger it; it is often described as "emotional numbing" or dissociation, depersonalization or in its chronic form depersonalization disorder.
I think we can call it "phonological unawareness". Or it can be related to the different levels of phonological awareness:
Phonological awareness refers to an individual's awareness of the phonological structure, or sound structure, of spoken words.
It is related with listening skills as well:
Alertness: Awareness and localization of sounds
Discrimination: Recognize same/different sounds
Memory: Recollection of sounds and sound patterns
Sequencing: Identify order of what was heard
Figure-ground: Isolate one sound from background of other sounds
Perception: Comprehension of sounds heard
Phonics deals with phonological awareness:
Phonics is a method for teaching reading and writing the English language by developing learners' phonemic awareness—the ability to hear, identify, and manipulate phonemes—in order to teach the correspondence between these sounds and the spelling patterns (graphemes) that represent them.
That is to say, it is usually mentioned regarding to teaching the language to the children or neurolingustic researches about bilinguals or non-native speakers.
Another source that mentions the term:
Accurate word learning requires identification of the sounds and letters in the word. Without such clarity, meanings are harder to learn; build, built, and bill differ only by one phoneme, as do bruise and breeze, and goal and gold. One of my fifth graders, years ago, was sure for weeks that the Gold Rush had something to do with soccer ("goal rush"), a semantic confusion directly tied to phonological unawareness.
And there is more to add to this topic. Phonological history of the English language.
Now that you mention it, we should talk about Mary–marry–merry merger also:
One of the best-known pre-rhotic mergers is known as the Mary–marry–merry merger, which consists of the mergers before intervocalic /r/ of /æ/ and /ɛ/ with historical /eɪ/. This merger is quite widespread in North America.
Another useful question:
How are 'marry', 'merry', and 'Mary' pronounced differently?
Best Answer
I'd say given person's mind is boxed in. That's where thinking outside the box becomes essential.