Clash-of-clans – When is it not a good idea to use both attacks in clan war

clash-of-clans

In the past, members haven't used attacks in clan wars and this was a huge problem. Is there ever a time when it's a good idea not to attack the enemy? For example, I've heard of people saying they didn't attack because they knew we were going to win or lose. How do you know in advance if you're going to win or lose?

Best Answer

In most cases those are just assumptions whether you are going to win or to lose. But you can browse through your enemies and compare your strengths: If your enemy is roughly equal and most of the opponent clan members have used their attacks already while your clan has most of them left, then you are able to say that it is likely that you will win the clan war.

And reasons why some clan members would not attack in this case? Well, if you will probably win the clan war and the remaining opponents all have bulwarks for which you would need plenty of troops while the possible loot is nearby zero, then it's wise not to attack those enemies.

So you always have to weigh between the possibility of winning the war and the profitability of attacking an enemy concerning the loot.