Warning : I'm asking why not how 😉
Some Matt Lowne and Scott Manley tutorials show how to put satellites in geostationary orbit.
My question is : for what use? Even Matt Lowne says that geostationary orbit around Kerbin is useless since there are antennas everywhere on the surface.
The only use I see is for foreign bodies communication system but most of them have the geosynchronous orbit outside of the SOI. And I suppose a 3 satellite configuration even orbiting at slightly the body's radius altitude is enough to not lose control of probes.
My thinking is :
- Weather: not in stock
- Local survey for a short range rover for example: well, at one time the satellite will be obstructed by the body and KSC communication will be lost…
- The wiki says "ease to release payloads": how?
Do you have any application of geostationary orbits while playing KSP ?
Best Answer
That depends. When you create a new game, then you have various difficulty options. One is to play without the additional ground stations. When you do that, then you need a direct line of sight to the KSC. So you will need a satellite network in Kerbin's orbit to ensure a permanent communication link. A geostationary satellite above the KSC is a very useful asset in this game mode.
But even if you prefer to play with the additional ground stations enabled: Some people play KSP as a sandbox spaceflight simulator and not as a progression-oriented game. These players want to try everything real space programs do in the real world. Geostationary orbits are one of these things, so people want to try it too.
Imagine you have a mothership orbiting, say, Duna, with more than one lander. You want all these landers to land close to each other. After you brought the first lander down and then undock the next, your motherhhip will be above a different point on the surface. So you need to wait an orbit until you are in the same position again. But if you are in a geosynchronous orbit, you can deorbit them all one after another, perform the same deorbiting maneuver in the same way, and they will end up at the same location on the surface.
But I agree that from a career-mode point of view, this is kind of a constructed scenario. If you want to bring a lot of payload to one location on the surface, you would usually land it all together. If you bring multiple independent landers to a planet, you usually do that because you want to land them in different biomes, far away from each other.