[RPG] By RAW, how can Prestidigitation create sound

cantripsdnd-3.5espells

As an example of the uses of Prestidigitation, the 3.5e PHB lists "Common tricks with prestidigitations include producing tinklings of ethereal music". However, the rules text for Prestidigitation, as duplicated in the SRD, does not appear to make any references to sound or the means to create it. So, by RAW, how can Prestidigitation create sound?

Best Answer

Prestidigitation can perform any minor effect except as explicitly limited by its constraints.

The effect of prestidigitation is as follows:

Once cast, a prestidigitation spell enables you to perform simple magical effects for 1 hour. The effects are minor and have severe limitations.

Everything after this in the first paragraph of the spell description is a limitation, not an exhaustive list of what the spell can do. You can do anything with this spell, as long as it's a minor effect and doesn't exceed one of the listed limitations.

The second paragraph, which only appears in the Player's Handbook, describes only examples and shows the intent of the rules. Most of the examples given are not explicitly listed in the first paragraph, but are possible uses of prestidigitation because they are minor magical effects and do not exceed any of the first-paragraph limitations.

The second paragraph does not appear in the SRD because the SRD includes only rules text, and omits examples. Examples are not rules, but are text used to explain or clarify the rules. This supports the interpretation that prestidigitation can create ethereal music because it's a minor effect. The entire second paragraph is a series of examples for the purpose of rules clarification or flavor text, and this is the sole reason that paragraph is omitted from the SRD.

Put another way, the question arises from the assumption that paragraph 1 provides an exhaustive list of effects the spell is capable of, which is impossible to reconcile with the examples given in paragraph 2. If we assume that the examples are correct, the only valid interpretation of paragraph 1 is that it is not exhaustive, but defines limitations on an otherwise unbounded and largely freeform spell.