Witch bolt seems to have a bad rap. One difference I see between witch bolt and other spells is that it is sustained/continued/ongoing damage.
If I spam a spell caster with fire bolts, magic missiles or even fireball, there's still a gap between the time I deal damage, and the next time I deal damage, which could conceivably give an opposing spellcaster a chance to cast their own spell without a concentration check.
If I use witch bolt on a spell caster, won't this require them to make a concentration check automatically in order to cast a spell? That seems like a pretty nasty way of dealing with a spellcaster (who may not have a very high constitution). Even 1 HP of damage would require a DC 10 constitution saving throw, right?
Too bad you can't upcast it to cause higher damage in later rounds. (Even one round per level – a second level spell slot also causes the extra damage in the second round, etc.)
Best Answer
You only make a concentration check when you take damage.
The rules for concentration state:
Witch bolt states:
Witch bolt can only deal damage on your turn, so a target would only have to make a concentration check on your turn when you use your action to trigger witch bolt. Additionally, there are no circumstances where a concentration check is required for casting a spell with a casting time of 1 Action or Bonus Action.