The Minor Conjuration ability given to Conjuration Wizards allows you to replicate non-magical object you have seen, so could you theoretically create your own spellbook, or even the spellbook of a powerful wizard, and prepare spells of of it? To bypass the "You would have to remember the whole book" solution, assume this wizard took the keen mind feat.
[RPG] Could you replicate a spell book using minor conjuration
class-featurednd-5esummoningwizard
Related Topic
- [RPG] Can “Minor Conjuration” be used as often as a wizard wants
- [RPG] Does a fluid substance (a beer), created with Minor Conjuration, disappear from one’s body after drinking it when this class feature is used again
- [RPG] To what extent would a wizard be able to combine feats to learn to mimic unknown spells
Best Answer
Yes.
Makes a Copy of the Item
Minor Conjuration reads:
Jeremy Crawford tweeted a ruling which at the time was an offical ruling (now unofficially) ruled that it is a magical facsimile:
Spell Books Are Non-Magical
The description of the Spellbook class feature reads:
The book description doesn't use the term magical in all of the descriptions of possible forms the book can take. Including the inks:
Rules as IntendedJeremy Crawford also (now) unofficially ruled a spellbook isn't necessarily magical:
So, together, we get an answer of yes. You can use Minor Conjuration to get a copy of a non-magical spellbook.
Would it be a Blank Book?
No. An object in D&D is defined:
Words are not discrete items, so are not objects in themselves. They become a part of the book when they are written in them. Aruging otherwise would be arguing that if you targeted a book (an object) with spells that target one object like disintegrate or true polymorph, would somehow leave the words separate from the book.
An update to that, is that the latest version of Sage Advice carries this question:
The practical upshot, is the Wizard should still be able to replicate his SpellBook, having seen all of it. But walking into a library once wouldn't allow him to conjure any and all titles of all the books. This seems like a reasonable compromise position, but still leaves he answer to the question: yes.