[RPG] dvantage on a non-adjacent attack against an unconscious creature

advantage-and-disadvantageconditionsdnd-5eproneunconscious

The unconscious condition states the following two effects (PHB 292):

  • The creature drops whatever it's holding and falls prone.

  • Attack rolls against the creature have advantage

Under the prone condition it says (ibid):

  • An attack roll against the creature has advantage if the attacker is
    within 5 feet of the creature. Otherwise, the attack roll has
    disadvantage.

The rules of advantage/disadvantage include the following paragraph (PHB 171):

  • If circumstances cause a roll to have both advantage and disadvantage,
    you are considered to have neither of them, and you roll one d20. This
    is true even if multiple circumstances impose disadvantage and only
    one grants advantage or vice versa. In such a situation, you have
    neither advantage nor disadvantage.

The question then is, does one receive advantage for a non-adjacent attack against an unconscious foe?

Are the effects of unconsciousness written to define the condition as it is, or are we meant to "calculate" the full truth by recognizing that the unconscious advantage and prone disadvantage (of non-adjacent attacks) should cancel out?

Best Answer

The rules that you've quoted are pretty clear. You gain advantage when attacking unconscious creatures, and you gain disadvantage when attacking prone creatures from further than 5 feet away. If you have both advantage and disadvantage — you're attacking an unconscious creature from further than 5 feet away — you get neither, instead.