My players asked a couple of questions concerning the Still Spell feat.
First, on armor:
Arcane Spell Failure: Armor interferes with the gestures that a
spellcaster must make to cast an arcane spell that has a somatic
component.
Ok, that's pretty clear.
But does that really mean that a Wizard can be in a full-plate and be able to cast a spell with no somatic component? There's no other limit to it?
Second, on combat while on horseback:
Casting Spells while Mounted: [If] you’re casting the spell while the mount is moving [then] you have to make a Concentration check […] (DC 10 + spell level) or lose the spell. [etc]
Would still spell make the concentration check easier?
Or it is already assumed that the somatic part of the spell should be considered separately? (ie: no ride roll needed but concentration stays the same)
Best Answer
As far as a wizard wearing full plate, there would be no inhibition on spellcasting other than stilling a spell and having the necessary higher level spell slot to do it. Note however that there are other stipulations to wearing armor one is not proficient in, and there isn't a spell that I know of which grants temporary proficiency to armor specifically.
Pertinent is this rule about armor proficiency:
And including concentration. Just in case you want your wizard in full plate on top of the mount.
I would rule that it would not, agreeing with KRyan's answer as far as that goes. Just like concentrating in a swarm or other distracting conditions, it seems the rule for mounted spellcasting is derived from the same. Concentration check still stands.