[RPG] the point of force sensitive only talents being marked in a talent tree for force sensitives

star-warsstar-wars-edge-of-the-empire

In Star Wars: Edge of the Empire there is a single force talent tree called "Force Sensitive Exile". In the blurb about this tree it says "In Edge of the Empire, the primary way one becomes a Force-sensitive character is by choosing the Force Sensitive Exile specialisation".

This obviously implies that if you have chosen this specialisation you are by definition force sensitive. Given you cannot buy any of the talents from this spec without having bought the spec first why does it label some (but not all) of the talents as "Force sensitive only"? It is the only place in the book that this restriction is referenced and it seems totally superfluous.

I can imagine situation from my knowledge of Expanded universe why they might be relevant (eg if you are cut off from the force then you can't use those talents but could use others from the tree) but this is with reference from outside the book.

Have I missed a rule somewhere that makes sense of this tag on the talents?

Best Answer

I'm still looking for the sidebar where I thought I read the answer on this issue, but initial scans of EotE and F&D have not turned up anything.

For now, I will give you a quote from Sam Stewart, Senior RPG Producer at Fantasy Flight Games (and the top guy at FFG for all issues related to the Star Wars Role Playing Games):

You are correct, none of the specializations in Force and Destiny give you Force Rating 1. So if your career does not make you Force Sensitive (as Force and Destiny's careers do) you must take Exile or Emergent to become Force Sensitive. Note, this does not stop you from taking Healer as a tree, but you will be unable to use any Force talents (including talents that increase your Force Rating; those will be "dormant" until you gain Force Rating 1).

Scroll to the bottom of the entry at https://community.fantasyflightgames.com/index.php?/topic/108101-ffg-developer-answered-questions/page-5#entry1373510 if you want to read the original article in question.