[RPG] When can you see through your Ersatz Eye

dnd-5emagic-items

The description of the Ersatz Eye from Xanathar's Guide to Everything reads:

This artificial eye replaces a real one that was lost or removed. While the ersatz eye is embedded in your eye socket, it can’t be removed by anyone other than you, and you can see through the tiny orb as though it were a normal eye.

Upon reading this, my assumption was that a user attuned to it can see through it at all times. However, the sentence is written in what seems to be the most ambiguous way possible. If we take "and" as joining two independent clauses, then the sentence is equivalent to:

"You can see through the tiny orb as though it were a normal eye, and while the ersatz eye is embedded in your eye socket, it can’t be removed by anyone other than you."

This would imply that the user can see through it whether or not it's in their head. There are other ways to restructure this sentence with that implication – but there are certainly ways to read it which imply the opposite. If there was no comma before "and", or if there was a semicolon instead of a comma, then it would be a different matter. However, I believe that rules of English grammar alone will not suffice to resolve this.

Is there any reason to conclude that the eye cannot be seen through while it is removed from the user's head?

It seems to me that this ability is commensurate with an attunement slot in 5e. Its power would be handily limited by the requirements for attunement – if it's left somewhere for spying purposes, the user would have to be within 100 feet of it at least once every 24 hours. I can't say if it fits the power of a Common magic item, though. There are very few Common items which require attunement in 5e, though, and the only directly comparable ones seem to be from Eberron.

Best Answer

The key phrase here is at the start of the description:

This artificial eye replaces a real one that was lost or removed. While the ersatz eye is embedded in your eye socket...

And this from the magic item section of the Handbooks:

Using a magic item’s Properties might mean wearing or wielding it. A magic item meant to be worn must be donned in the intended fashion: boots go on the feet, gloves on the hands, hats and helmets on the head, and rings on the finger. Magic armor must be donned, a Shield strapped to the arm, a cloak fastened about the shoulders. A weapon must be held.

The item clearly states that its intended method of being worn is in an empty eye socket. It will not work if it is not correctly equipped.

Thus the grammar mistakes made by the publishers later in the section is a non-issue.

So when you remove the eye from your socket, you are no longer using it in its intended fashion, thus loose its benefit.

Related Topic