The sense verbs are an interesting paradigm. English has three types of sense verb (with a lot of overlap), and a number of derived nouns. Two of the verb classes differ in whether they're volitional, and the other one is an experiential sense with special "Flip" syntax.
One type of verb is the Non-Volitional: hear, see, smell, taste, touch/feel
Another is the Volitional: listen, look, smell, taste, touch/feel
Hearing: You listen to something on purpose, but you can hear it by accident.
Vision: You look at something on purpose, but you can see it by accident.
Verbs for the other three senses don't vary; you can smell, taste, or touch/feel on purpose or not.
The third type is the Flip verbs: sound, look, smell, taste, feel.
Again the three chemical/kinesthetic senses don't change in form,
though only feel works as a Flip verb:
That looks tasty / sounds flat / smells sour / tastes delicious / feels weird.
The subject of a Flip verb is not the experiencer, but rather whatever is causing the sensation being experienced. The experiencer is normally not mentioned, but if it is, it occurs in a preposition phrase (most likely to me).
Interestingly, only hearing — the sense used by language — gets to have 3 distinct sense verbs: hear, listen, and sound.
As far as nouns go, one can speak of a look and a sight (respectively from look and see), as well as a glimpse, a vision, an appearance, a sighting, an image — and no doubt many more — for vision alone. This is what a thesaurus is for.
Touch is underrepresented in nouns; adjectives are more likely. But one does speak of something having a feel, occasionally a feeling — a word which can be generalized to cover any metaphoric, psychological, or spiritual sensation, whether experienced or not, as in
I had a feeling he was going to betray us.
Best Answer
For taste, from Oxford Dictionary:
Nothing comes to mind for touch besides texture-specific words. "Grimy", "slimy", and "chalky" are all words I would use to describe textures that are personally repulsive in the right context. Touch-related words typically describe unique textures; their connotation often depends on the context and the reader/listener. Consequently, the negative feeling of the word depends on what you are describing and the context you are describing it in. Adverbial qualifiers ("overwhelmingly", "awfully", etc.) may be added to change the effect of the adjective.
If you really want a texture-neutral negative adjective for touch, I would stick to describing something as an "unpleasant texture" or something to that effect.