I have heard several sentences in which there was a prominent double negative, but the double negative "sounded right". Is this ever true, or is it just a misleading feeling?
Edited to include an example:
"Did you enjoy the movie?"
"Well, I didn't not enjoy it, but…"
I suppose that may just be bad grammar, but sometimes it seems to be the quickest way to say it.
Best Answer
Double negatives can be perfectly fine in English.
Here the double negative expresses a weak positive, a very common construction.
This is a figure of speech called litotes: the double negative (if that's what it is) is used to express a strong positive. Sometimes any double negative with a positive meaning is considered a litotes, including the unremarkable example 2 above. Other people restrict the term to those negations that express a strong positive through an apparently weak positive, in a mildly ironical manner, as in this example (3).
This is the rhetorical double negative, often considered a form of litotes. It expresses a strong positive, though without irony.
Here the word not is used twice, once in contracted form (don't) and once in full, to express a weak positive. Double not is a special case: it is felt to be even more redundant than other double negatives and sounds rather colloquial. The majority will probably use this in speech and informal writing, where it is perfectly acceptable, but not elsewhere.
The boundary between negations and other kinds of words is by no means sharp. The prefixes un- and im-/in- are usually considered negatives, as are hardly and many others; bad is sometimes considered a negative word, sometimes not, etc.