I've been watching The Sopranos recently; a very useful vehicle for picking up American pronunciation and mob slang. In series one, episode seven, Tony Soprano and his wife Carmela are in the school principal's office. A.J their 13-year-old son has been suspended for stealing and drinking sacramental wine. The school's psychologist (and therefore someone who is educated) tells the parents
Anthony has misbehaved. He should be consequenced
At this utterance my boyfriend and I both gawped at each other in disbelief. He said that the phrase should have been "He should face the consequences" whereas I believe the phrase "He should be disciplined" would have fitted better.
There are 3,310 results for be consequenced on Google, which I think is pretty astounding. Some examples:
Return to your homes, or you will be consequenced. I, Robot
He was consequenced, or appeared to be consequenced, in his romantic notions and the way he lived.
Nicolas: A Mother's Search for Her SonShould they deviate, even in thinking and regardless of behaviour, from institutional compliance, they may be consequenced and further stigmatised by everyone from institutional staff to probation officers …
Humane Prisons- We did have to work on his defenses, what purpose they served, how he might be consequenced if he hurt others, and what more helpful responses than opposition and control might be.
Nurturing Adoptions: Creating Resilience after Neglect and Trauma
For what it's worth my spell-checker (USA and UK) underlines consequenced in red. TFD lists a few idioms using consequence as a noun: 1) in consequence 2) of consequence 3) face the consequences 4) suffer the consequences
What type of error is this? And is this mistake often heard in speech? (I mean, it is an error, isn't it?)
Best Answer
Long story short
Consequenced has been in use for nigh on 200 years, albeit not exactly at the top of the pile of first words to use when you want to talk about being on the receiving end of consequences so it seems that to call it an error would be something of an injustice; without a governing language body determining what's right and what's wrong in English; unusual but becoming more common might be a better term. (Someone must have asked for a SWR to cover that).
Despite OED having a mention of consequence as a verb it's quite likely that the recent popularisation doesn't come from Milton's Tetrachordon given the gap between 1645 and 1830 where I could find no mention, it could well be that consequence has been 're-verbified' although it's quite possible it was in use but there are just no scanned documents for that period. But from 1830 onward, there's no doubt that consequenced is being used mainly to mean having consequences applied to a person or thing.
There is a more recent dictionary entry, which simply echoes OED, but is not marked obsolete or even rare.
I'm not sure how OED/Webster got drawing inference/conclusions from Milton's work - I think he meant exactly what it says on the tin adding consequences to an action (marriage/divorce). There's a lengthy chunk about that at the bottom of the answer.
Long story
One of the first Google results I get is this analysis of that moment on the show.
The Sopranos on the Couch - Analyzing Televisions's Greatest Series (Maurice Yacowar - 2003) Google Books
The word 'modish' is a bit of a giveaway despite modish also having an archaistic taint as the OED suggests
Just how modish is it?
The Brigham Young Google Books query tool is vastly superior to anything Google provide for querying their corpora and in the Google Books (American) corpora it lists occurrences per decade of consequenced as 1830-5 1890-1 1920-3 1960-1 1970-1 1980-15 1990-19 2000-20
Of the 5 from 1830 - two are bad scans and one is a duplicate giving us just 2
From the 1840's (UK publication)
From the 1890's
Of the three from the 1920's one is a reprint of Randolph, one is a bad scan but one is valid.
The single 1960 hit actually provides 20 different books - because Google Books itself doesn't restrict it's list to any specific corpora. What is noticable is that most of those books that have consequenced properly scanned (and enough of a snippet to be able to determine the meaning) are from Indian sources. The obviously US scan shows me a snippet that is cut off right through the word consequenced but from the search page the text reads:
The 1970 list gives another 20 or so books, many of them Indian, one Australian using ill-consequenced acts and number of legal type references to consequenced tax. But two are directly related to the Soprano use (even though one is Canadian - that's still North American)
The 1980's are supposed to have fifteen US books, Google Books offers me 45; again many of them are from India, some from Australia, one from Pakistan, and another using the word/term ill-consequenced.
The 1990's should be nineteen US books, but again I'm presented with forty-five or so and again a good number of them are Indian and Australian in origin but it's clear that the general trend, of the US books, is turning towards behavioural issues and discipline.
Note that a number of other books in this group print the word consequenced in 'quotes', perhaps to denote that it's use is not all that common (even though it actually was fairly common).
In the 2000's list there are over a hundred books listed and at least half of them are related to behavioural issues particularly relating to children's behaviour.
All in all, consequenced has been kicking about for a while, it's just not been very popular. From 1970 it's picked up considerable use in a way that seems to be a euphamism of sorts for punishment and discipline but also with the added 'edge' that consequences can also be rewards. It's not restricted to the US, a lot of Indian, Australian and more recently European published books feature consequenced.
Milton, OED & Webster
Some quoted parts from John Milton - 1645 - Tetrachordon Google Books
I'm not sure why OED and Webster define consequencing as drawing inferences [or conclusions].
In the full context of Milton's writing (he is discussing marriage & divorce) the rules of marriage (and consequences of breaking them) are not bound by "Religion, Law or Reason" but by "the meetness of help and solace, which is the formal cause and end of that definition that sustains them."
And he goes on to say "... yet Moses, as if foreseeing the miserable work that mans ignorance and pusillanimity would make in the matrimonious business and endeavouring his utmost to prevent it, condescends in this place to such a methodical and School-like way of defining, and consequencing, as in no place of the whole Law more."
Those 'School-like' definitions are presumably from Matthew 5 & 19, Deuteronomy 24 and/or Corinthians 7 (Both include 'rules' of marriage and consequences of breaking those rules). Consequencing, to me, means adding consequences to an action in this case, marriage and divorce.
One should note that the Tetrachordon was only one of four pamphlets Milton wrote arguing for reformation of the laws regarding divorce in England and at the time, Milton was trying to get divorced from his wife.