Learn English – Is the phrase “the alive animal” grammatically correct
adjectivesgrammaticality
Is it wrong to use the phrase "The alive animal"?
Is it alright to say, "The animal was alive."?
Best Answer
The animal was alive is a correct sentence. The alive animal is a noun phrase and therefore not a sentence, since at the very least it is missing a verb.
Having said that, I interpret the question as asking whether it is possible to place the adjective alive in front of a noun. In other words, can alive be used attributively? Most adjectives can be used both attributively (before the noun) and predicatively (following a copula such as the verbs to be, to seem, to look). So happy can be used both attributively and predicatively:
The happy child [played in the sand].
The child looked happy.
But some adjectives can only be used predicatively; they cannot be used attributively. Alive is one such adjective, so the alive animal is ungrammatical. There are many other non-attributive adjectives beginning with the letter a. For example, it is ungrammatical to say:
*the afraid child ..
*the asleep child ..
*the alone child ..
Other adjectives can only be used attributively; they cannot be used predicatively. For example:
Yes, "Please be informed that..." is correct, as is "For your information".
Both formulations are common and current.
The former is considered more polite, and is the accepted form in written communication, but it can also be used sarcastically in oral communication by a speaker who wishes to assert authority over a subordinate.
The latter is used in spoken conversation except when particular formality is required. It can also be used assertively but is not an inherently assertive formulation.
'Please be informed that' is more polite than 'This is to inform you that'. The latter implies authority, so the 'you' becomes an object.
In other words, an object is supposed to be passive, if not powerless.
It sounds as if you are trying to convey a binary status such as active and inactive. This is one of the many meanings of live
2.: exerting force or containing energy: as
a : afire, glowing live coals
b : connected to electric power
c : charged with explosives and containing shot or a bullet live ammunition;
also : armed but not exploded a live bomb
d : imparting or driven by power a live axle
e : being in operation a live microphone
Each of these uses suggest the ability to turn the status on or off. This is a common usage in American English.
It is true that alive can also convey active status
2 . a : still in existence, force, or operation : active kept hope alive
b : still active in competition with a chance of victory must win to stay alive in the playoffs
However, this usage is not common where there is little direct control over the alive status. One would not say an alive circuit or alive ammunition. In fact, alive is more often used as a predicate adjective than an ordinary modifier.
Best Answer
The animal was alive is a correct sentence. The alive animal is a noun phrase and therefore not a sentence, since at the very least it is missing a verb.
Having said that, I interpret the question as asking whether it is possible to place the adjective alive in front of a noun. In other words, can alive be used attributively? Most adjectives can be used both attributively (before the noun) and predicatively (following a copula such as the verbs to be, to seem, to look). So happy can be used both attributively and predicatively:
But some adjectives can only be used predicatively; they cannot be used attributively. Alive is one such adjective, so the alive animal is ungrammatical. There are many other non-attributive adjectives beginning with the letter a. For example, it is ungrammatical to say:
Other adjectives can only be used attributively; they cannot be used predicatively. For example: