First of all, this must be corrected (thanks, tchrist):
who are considering to be employed --> who are considering employment
Now, to your choices: none of the two is the best.
The way to do it:
Go to Google Books (not vanilla Google); select and test your critical cores.
The best (and the most natural) is at the top here:
"difficult to get even an"
About 1,990 results
"difficult even to get an"
About 246 results
"difficult to even get an"
About 127 results
Grammatical reason: it is considered best for clarity's sake to place the emphasizer ("even," here) closest to the entity of interest.
First, this is a matter of style, rather than a grammatical matter. Therefore, there will be differing opinions. Does the publishing firm you are working with on the translations have a house style manual? If so, you should follow that. If not, then I would suggest picking one of the major style manuals used by many English language publications (such as The Associated Press Stylebook or The Chicago Manual of Style) and following that style.
The AP Stylebook has this entry for capitalization of geographic names:
Capitalize common nouns when they form an integral part of a proper name, but lowercase them when they stand alone: Pennsylvania Avenue, the avenue; the Philippine Islands, the island; the Mississippi River, the river.
Lowercase common nouns that are not part of a specific name: the Pacific islands, the Swiss mountains, Zhejiang province.
If you follow this particular style, and want to apply them to your examples, you will need to decide if the name of the geographic feature (waterfall, cave, trail) is actually a part of the proper name. If so, I would go with:
- Lorem Waterfall
- Ipsum Cave
- Lorem Educational Trail
If you do not (or local custom does not) deem the geographic feature as part of the proper name, then you could lowercase them:
- Lorem waterfall
- Ipsum cave
- Lorem educational trail
In each case, I would put the proper name first. As a native English speaker, it sounds better to me. Of course, there are counter-examples (such as Loch Ness or Lake Superior).
As I said, this is a matter of style. Consistency is the key. Also, if you're working with an editor, they will help you decide how their publication would handle this.
Best Answer
Since you said "ongoing", as an adjective, further could be used in the sense 'additional.'
In the same vein, you could use further in your sentence, however, in my opinion a better construction will be: