I am wondering what "magic" means within the context of 5th edition D&D, particularly as it relates to the detect magic spell. I am familiar with the "The Weave of Magic" and spells slots and such.
The detect magic spell allows you to sense the presence of "magic" and shows a glow around creatures of objects that "bear magic". But what is meant by "magic"? This same question applies to the dispel magic spell and I suspect other spells.
Let's imagine a scenario in which a spellcaster shoots a magical ray of ice at a tree and freezes it. How can I tell what is "magic" here? Is the spellcaster magic while casting it? Is the ray magic (but not a creature or object)? Is the frozen tree now magic, even if encased in mundane ice? Once the ice melts is the water magic? And if the tree has residual damage from the spell, is the tree now magic, or its damaged areas?
I've been playing detect magic pretty loosely and it has worked fine, but sometimes I'm not sure what to highlight in the world. In these examples for example I would not highlight the defrosted damaged tree or water, but maybe I would highlight "residual signatures of magic" or the like. I would likely also highlight a giant cube of ice created through magic, even if it is not strictly described as magical or even described as part of a spell, but merely a consequence of it. Would starting a forest fire with produce flame mean the whole forest fire is magical? I suspect not, but I could be convinced. What about a floating mote of earth being held magically into the air?
I'd like some guidance on what draws the line between magical and non-magical.
Best Answer
In 5e, things that refer to magic only interact with entities that have/are magic as part of their crunch, not fluff. To determine if something is actually magic, rather than described as magic but totally not actually magic, use the rule on page 17 of the 2017 Sage Advice Compendium:
(Note that 'described as magic' here means something other than what it normally means, since white dragons, as the entry notes before this passage, are described as magical. It seems like the author means 'in its description' to mean 'in the part of its description where the rules go, you know, its actual description' - but that is contrary to how the authors have claimed you should read spells (etc.) to prevent certain kinds of textual ambiguities and errors from being problems, so make of it what you will.)
This is a helpful starting place, but not sufficient; we still don't know how instantaneous spells with long durations or secondary effects of spells work. For the former, it helps that the rules say about instantaneous spells:
That means that all the magic after the instant the spell is cast is fluff magic instead of crunch magic. We run this as all the magic stuff happening in a sequence of moments that nonetheless as a whole paradoxically takes up no time. This is important as a naive ruling that such spells do the magic first and then the rest of the seemingly magical effects happen leads to undesirable behavior like being able to fireball people inside an anti-magic field.
For secondary effects of spells, you're just going to have to make a ruling. A summoned creature should probably be magical, grass that caught fire from produce flame and then spread to a house probably should not be. The bullet point that makes them magical is the 'fuelled by spell slots' line, so the more that seems to be true the more it should count, presumably.