Learn English – Can you really “See that thing in person”

figures-of-speechidiomsmeaning

Consider the following scenario:

A woman at a store is shown a dress by a clerk. After a few moments, she tells the clerk that she would like "to see it in red".

The clerk would then go and fetch her the same dress but colored red, rather than whatever he had just shown her.

There would be no confusion- the in red is clearly describing an attribute of the dress. If the clerk were to then drape a red blanket around the woman and show her the same dress, the clerk would surely be fired.

And yet, if I were to look at a picture of a coffee table online and say "I want to see that in person", the same logic could not be applied. You can't see the coffee table in person, because it is a coffee table. Coffee tables don't typically come as people (I should hope!).

So is one correct over the other? Shouldn't the meaning be consistent across the two phrases? Or is there some way of considering the two different contexts that both make sense from?

Best Answer

In short, the word "in" has multiple uses.

  • see that dress in red - See the same kind of dress, but with red fabric

  • see the Eiffel Tower in person - Visit the Eiffel Tower yourself instead of looking at photos of it

  • The business was in the red - The business has no money and their balance sheet total is in red ink signifying a loss

  • He was in the pool - He was physically located within the pool

None of these are the same meanings of the word "in". They are similar but not identical. In some cases the prepositional phrase "in blah blah" modifies some parts of the sentence, in other cases it modifies others. Context lets you decide.

  • I saw that coffee table in red - Is the coffee table red? Or were you wearing red clothes when you saw it? Both interpretations are possible, but only one is likely.
Related Topic